Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Says Berkeley, Stanford

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator Marym625's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    5,966
    Thanks
    12,503
    Thanked 10,450 Times in 3,212 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Says Berkeley, Stanford

    After applying various statistical models to subsets of 2016 primary voting data several academic researchers conclude Hillary Clinton’s win was only possible through widespread vote fraud.





    Widespread allegations of election fraud and voter suppression across the United States during the 2016 Democratic Primary has sparked the interest of several academic researchers and what they discovered in their research is disturbing.
    Namely that Hillary’s win was could have only been possible a result of widespread election fraud.

    In fact, one of the statistical models applied by Standford University researcher Rodolfo Cortes Barragan to a subset of the data found that the probability of the “huge discrepancies” of which “nearly all are in favor of Hillary Clinton by a huge margin” was “statistically impossible” and that “the probability of this this happening was is 1 in 77 billion”.
    More at link including studies
    Link


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •